ENC 1102 Evaluation Argument
The purpose of this essay is to give you the opportunity to further the critical analysis skills you acquired in ENC 1101. All analysis begins with a personal judgment or evaluation: like or dislike. The Evaluation Argument asks you to explore, deepen, explain, and logically defend your evaluation. First, you select [or your professor selects for you] a cultural artifact to be evaluated (e.g. a book, song, album, movie, piece of technology, etc.). Second, you will evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the artifact in order to judge whether it is good, bad, or some combination of both. Third, you will establish criteria by which you judge the artifact; you support your judgment with good reasons and evidence.
Characteristics of an Evaluation Argument
A successful evaluation argument will do the following:
· Accurately but briefly describe the artifact so that readers who may not be familiar with the subject will still be able to understand what it is.
· Assert a clear and specific claim (one’s judgment of artifact) early in the essay—usually the last sentence of the introduction.
· Establish clearly defined criteria as the basis for the evaluation.
· Provide well-supported reasons to defend its evaluation.
· Present a knowledgeable and researched discussion of the subject.
· Present a balanced and fair assessment of the artifact; maintain a respectful tone in addressing opposing viewpoints/evaluations of the artifact.
· Reinforce the claim and assert the significance of the evaluation and the artifact in the conclusion.
· The paper must be 1000-1500 words in length; information on the Works Cited page does not count toward this total.
· The final draft of this paper must be submitted to Turnitin.
· Minimum of two secondary sources accessed from TCC library
· MLA format for presentation and for source documentation (in-text citations and Works Cited Page)
Ways of Organizing an Evaluation Argument
A possible outline:
Introduction (at least one paragraph)
· Introduce and describe the artifact and its rhetorical context.
· Present your thesis statement—your judgment about the artifact.
Body (at least four paragraphs)
· Identify criteria for evaluation and provide reasons and evidence, discussing criteria.
· Acknowledge and address objections to your criteria and other opinions/evaluations of the artifact.
· Use an effective argument structure that guides the reader from one point to the next (paying attention to transitions both between paragraphs and within).
Conclusion (at least one paragraph)
· Restate your overall judgment/thesis – use different words.